000 | 02033cam a22002777i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 0000070747 | ||
003 | 0001 | ||
008 | 161210s2016 enk b 001 0 eng d | ||
020 | _a9781138930803 (paperback) | ||
020 | _a1138930806 | ||
040 |
_aBTCTA _beng _cBTCTA _erda _dYDXCP _dBDX _dKSG _dOCLCQ _dGGM _dDLC |
||
042 | _alccopycat | ||
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a327.17470951 _223 |
084 |
_a327.17470951 _bFIT-A |
||
100 | 1 |
_aFitzpatrick, Mark, _c(Senior fellow for non-proliferation), _eauthor. |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aAsia's latent nuclear powers : _h[Book] : _bJapan, South Korea and Taiwan / _cMark Fitzpatrick. |
300 |
_a175 pages : _c24 cm. |
||
365 |
_a01 _b0.00 |
||
490 | 1 | _aAdelphi ; | |
520 | _aUnder what conditions would the democracies in Northeast Asia seek to join the nuclear weapons club? Japan, South Korea and Taiwan are threshold nuclear powers by virtue of their robust civilian nuclear-energy programmes. All three once pursued nuclear weapons and all face nuclear-armed adversaries. Fitzpatrick's latest book analyses these past nuclear pursuits and current proliferation drivers. It considers how long it would take each to build a nuclear weapon if such a fateful decision were made but does not predict such a scenario. Unlike when each previously went down a nuclear path, democracy and a free press now prevail as barriers to building bombs in the basement. Reliance on US defence commitments is a better security alternative--as long as such guarantees remain credible. But extended deterrence is not a barrier to proliferation of sensitive nuclear technologies. Nuclear hedging by its Northeast Asian partners will challenge Washington's nuclear diplomacy. | ||
521 | _aAll. | ||
650 | 0 |
_aNuclear nonproliferation _zJapan. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aNuclear nonproliferation _zKorea (South). |
|
650 | 0 |
_aNuclear nonproliferation _zTaiwan. |
|
852 |
_p55094 _91827.95 _h327.17470951 FIT-A _vGlobal~Link Information Services _bJapan Studies Corner _dBooks _t1 _q1-New _aJZL-CUI |
||
999 |
_c66919 _d66919 |